Originally posted by TC
The intrepid was *still* a destroyer. And how is a destroyer any more a carrier than a strike cruiser?
TC
Well, quoting from page 167 of the TPOF novel:
"A pair of fast transports with flared ore shuttle decks hovered protectively over a single *carrier*. The CV looked to have begun life as as one of the old destroyers that the Confederation had discarded and sold off. The Border Worlds had slung a single launch bay beneath its belly, reconfiguring it as a light carrier."
Also from page 323 of the TPOF novel:
"This ship *was* a destroyer abd she's still got her torps."
The Intrepid is refered to as a destroyer in the past sense, and as a carrier in the present sense. And since these obsevations and comments were made by Blair and Wilford respectively, one a carrier pilot and one a senior naval officer, I think its safe to assume they know what they're talking about.
While no-one disputes that the Intrepid began her life as a destroyer, that doesn't mean that she stays one throughout her life, anymore than the Tarawa is a transport because she was converted from a transport hull, or Britain's through-deck V/STOL carrriers are anti-submarine cruisers.
Best, Raptor