Bandit LOAF said:
Oh, well, it Chris may have said something, then I must also believe it.
I was not trying to convince you of either point, just indicate that there was a debate about this some time in the past. What's your point? That it's impossible that someone will not make that connection? Not that it even matters to the subject.
Bandit LOAF said:
(But if he's Space Hitler, why didn't he dissolve the Space Reichstag?!
No, but he would make no sense for Space Hitler to be a champion of democracy. Could you agree on that much?
Bandit LOAF said:
Except if it's not intended and it's not perceived then it's just something you made up.
If by “made up” you mean “found to be literally stated on the game”, then yes.
As for intention, how you are so sure that no one involved on the project had, at any point, entertained a brief idea of making a minimally meaningful comment? That it might have happened is slightly hinted by the fact that the references are there.
Bandit LOAF said:
I can take a similarly inappropriate, unconnected smattering of facts from Wing Commander IV and argue the *opposite*.
Do better, and show how Tolwyn saying "The Strong Shall Survive: Primary Universal Law" doesn't mean he believes that the
primary universal law is a darwinistic principle.
Even better, you could demonstrate how the statement "Progress only comes trough struggle" doesn't means that Tolwyn considered it would be best for society to devote itself to
struggle in order to obtain
progress.
And it should be no trouble to elucidate how all this is nothing but a bunch of "inappropriate, unconnected smattering of facts"! After all, it would be overanalyzing to assume that "progress comes trough struggle" would have any connection "strong shall survive". It would plain simple making up stuff to argue that the strong would survive the struggle and that would mean progress.
Bandit LOAF said:
Ooh, and when you disrupt the balance by affecting peoples moral, our collectivist ship society reforms itself to react differently to events!
Oh yeah, very good. Making up an argument that doesn’t make sense really proves my argument and doesn’t make sense!
After all, that a made up interpretation of a WCIV can be constructed is the ultimate argument against any interpretation of WCIV.
Bandit LOAF said:
That was not intelligent discourse, it was calling an apple an orange.
Oh, so if you point to an apple and say “that’s an orange” it must mean anything I said about WCIV was wrong.
Bandit LOAF said:
Yes, that's what I mean, any movie about the Nazis that has Nazis in it is shallow. That's *obviously* what I'm trying to say. Thanks for clearing that up for everyone.
No, you said that a game about space nazis that *gasp* has space nazis is shallow.
Actually, what I was talking about was the "obvious" = "shallow" and "not subtle" = "not deep" part.
I point to some statement from Tolwyn, and you counter it by indicating that they had a SS logo. I specify another statement, and, no, that's irrelevant because they were using *black* uniforms. Nothing profound can possibly be present on a game were the bad guys are wearing black. If it were turquoise uniforms, then, who knows!
Bandit LOAF said:
At the risk of hurting your ego, you joined an argument about Wing Commander IV and Tolwyn *already in progress*.
No kidding. I was not being
really serious on that, you know.