Originally posted by Supdon3
Four years isnt that long for the development and testing of a new fighter. In 2665 they see the WC2 Bloodfang, begin developement of the Excalibur. By 2669 they have a new Bloodfang. Doesnt seem to hard to me.
Originally posted by Supdon3
The WC2 and WC3 fighters are completely different though.
Just because those games portray ships differently does not mean that they change in the Wing Commander universe itself.
That means you're also assuming that the Bloodfang in WC2 is brand new when we first see it, and that the WC3 Bloodfang is as well, and that they aren't spotted until we see them for the first time.Originally posted by Supdon3
Im saying that if it was, then it was designed to fight the one in WC2 and that the WC3 Bloodfang is another new fighter, with nothing to do with the Excalibur whatsoever.
Originally posted by Quarto
You know, I really don't get that... why is it that people who can't even build proper ships are always the ones who invent cloaking devices?
Originally posted by Nemesis
Sounds like heresy to me. Perhaps if you could expand on that a bit.
Just because the game engine changes and the ships look different on our computer screens does not mean they are different in the Wing Commander universe itself.
Originally posted by Mav23
WOW, has anybody here actually PLAYED Starlancer?
Originally posted by Kilroy
Maybe they just focus on other points of technology. Like you build the strongest, most perfect engine for a car, but the car itself is just a piece of junk...
Originally posted by Supdon3
The two are radically different looking. They arent the same.