Yeah, definitely tone down the bumpmapping by at least 100%.
And in this case I think that would be a good thing. No, just kidding. If the program he is using is similar to the one I use there is a percentage slider on how strongly the bump is applied. Based on the picture it looked like the percentage used would be around 150%. Of course his 3d program could be completely different.ChrisReid said:I don't think you could physically tone it down more than 100%, as that would be completely removing all bump mapping.
Kilrah said:That’s right, I’ve checked Max and it’s true, there’s an “amount” value that was set to 30. I’ve tried it with 10, what do you think of the result?