My issue with your argument was not your state of readiness. It isn't, it wasn't, it never was. My issue was the fact that you said that the WCP didn't have the same technology as SO. I'll go back and dig up your original post.
Edfilho said:
I Think confed was more powerfull (not largest) in the WCPSO age, when they had both great tech and were in a state of readiness (unlike WCP).
But you said that WCP fleet didn't have great tech, like the Plunkett cruisers, the Cerberus, and the Murphys, just because they weren't in SO. Reason why I had put "great tech" in why WCP was different from SO (which I agreed with the latter quote about "state of readiness"), was your "both" modifier. You did it, you included "great tech" as why the SO fleet was unlike WCP, you did it wrong, and you can't deny it no mattter how many future posts you will post about "state of readiness".
Even after this, you stick to your argument that the Cerberus was a big factor of the WCPSO fleet being more powerful. It was only two ships of this class for god's sake, yet you want to make an issue out of it.
Edfilho said:
The Cerberus is no diference?
And I must say that after you had finished the issue, as evidenced by
Edfilho said:
Let's just say that the WCP ERA fleet is the most powerful.
you just had to start this thread again 3 days later
after I had said something, until then, your argument was about the Cerberus.
Here it is in plain words. You got the "part A" of your argument wrong, but your "part B" was right, but you are trying to deny my accusation of your "part A" error by arguing "part B" more.