Leaving drafts in articles is a bad idea - you can use the Discussion/Talk page for that, if you want. Dund's used the Talk page for drafts before.for the time being i'd like to leave the old text in - just so i can confirm it's all right when i finish up the missions
Bob...nice thinking uploading those documents from AS. Jason Ryock typed up the other ones for me this evening and I uploaded them. I've created a TEMP category for those until we find a permanent home for them.
How should we organize these and other "official" communications?
I've been thinking about this all night and I REALLY think that the "War Declaration" page needs to have it's own article that should include or link to the article text.
There is alot about the War Declaration that needs to be explained - like that it's a limited action, and that some high-ranking Confed officers don't believe in it, and that the Kilrathi are basically allowing it to occur in order to lull Confed into a false sense of security.
And we want to put the audio quote from the Ambassador at the start of the WC Movie on this page too as part of our explanations and explorations of the start of the war.
But that's just my two cents. I think an event this big needs it's own article.
Please... no apostrophes. ):
Yeah that's certainly something we can do. We can start building the article in a TEMP form. If you want, you can start that as a little project. It'd be a good way for you to learn some code and not have to worry about an overly complex layout.
Okay, I can do that. I finished a rough of the Concordia today, and I'm working on cleaning it up into something better then draft form. I don't think it flows to well.
EDIT: Also I found another 'document' from AS, Turners report to Banbridge about the start of the war. It's not block texted like the others so I stumbled across it re-reading the battle for Concordia references. I put it on your talk page.
You kept writing "it's" the contraction of it is instead of the possessive "its" in the post.
https://www.wcnews.com/wcpedia/Talk:WCPedia_Rules said:I know the rule is "don't steal from Wikipedia, only from yourself"... but what if the two are the same? For instance, I wrote the entry on the Confederation and it's still sitting there six years later, practically unchanged and being voted on to merge with the main article. I think parts of it are better than what we have now - so could I go and rip those parts from my last solo revision? I'm itching for a go at the whole article, actually.
I also wrote an overview on battleships that's since been deleted - gone for over two years now. I don't have the original anymore, but it's still floating around the internet on various Wikipedia copycat sites. I'd like to take it, try and clean it up, bring it up to date. Is that kosher?
Bob McDob 11:53, 12 August 2010 (CDT)
https://www.wcnews.com/wcpedia/Category_talk:Factions said:Category talk:Factions]
Why isn't this listed on the sidebar? It's at least as important as "Equipment" - and Empire of Kilrah is a lot more major than Isometal Armor. Bob McDob 12:00, 12 August 2010 (CDT)
https://www.wcnews.com/wcpedia/Talk:Peter_Halcyon said:Talketer Halcyon]
Where does the part about Halcyon being killed on the 'Claw come from? He probably died, but that's a far cry from stating he definitely did. Bob McDob 12:22, 12 August 2010 (CDT)