Originally posted by TC
The standard life expectancy during the war would be rather low... because of the trillions of casualties and all. (...)
They probably don't have a good life expectancy worked out at that period, since it takes quite a while to get enough numbers to make a proper average.
I don't think that casualties themselves have an effect on life expectancy, TC, at least when it comes to predictions made by scientists...
Rather, it's more the restrictions
due to the war (like in medical care and in the diet) that account for the low numbers in war-times...
But I'm no expert in this, so I will stop here...
Yet, bringing up Tolwyn's age, reminds me this topic was discussed a while ago:
Originally posted by mpanty, in the "Kilrathi life expectancy?" thread
I think a more interesting question to ask here, would be what is the life expectancy of HUMANS in the 27th century?..
Because, considering that presently the expectancy is around 75 years for males, and 83 for females, and the rate of increase is 2.5 years every 10 years (or 4 months every month), we would expect the life expectancy in 2600 to be
150 years more than now ([600 years/10 years]*2.5 years), hence 225 years for males and 233 for females!!!!
As LOAF pointed out, such figures were however not achieved in 2600, for reasons in the biology field that don't seem very obvious...
Originally posted by Bandit LOAF, in the "Kilrathi life expectancy?" thread
The known records for human ages in the WCU are 156 years and 419 years. The latter was an isolated case which involved constant organ replacement...
If life expectancy, at the moment, is
increasing... what is there to stop it? Why shouldn't it occur indefinitely, when we think about the incredible technological progress still ahead of us?
I can simply
suppose the WC designers chose not to take this factor into account, possibly to simplify things, or simply because... "they couldn't think of absolutely everything"!
[Edited by mpanty on 06-12-2001 at 22:27]