I'm going to reply to your post anyway, though doing so is probably silly given your complete failure to respond to the Skipper issues above (and, of course, given the sheer idiocy of making these vauge claims *again* lecture about why that just isn't bright.)
These first two are 'seems reasonable!' arguments - they seem reasonable until you put half an ounce of thought into them.
Yeah its just pointless to argue the inconsistencies in the WC movie what with the insane accent changes,
Yes, the hired a British woman to hire a Belgian character. While this is a perfectly normal practice (Patrick Stewart, anyone?), it sounds like a semi-reasonable complaint on its face.
BUT! What you're comparing this offensive "accent" to is HAVING A TEXAN DISGUISE HER DRAWL WITH A FAKE FRENCH ACCENT! We're not looking at some incredible pantheon of French actresses that the evil Saffron Burrows has interrupted... we're talking about a game that had one of its programmers make up a cartoony (and completely unauthentic) accent.
the total change in ship aesthetics,
Great, but again it's a made up claim created specifically to created to discredit the movie... and it ignores the many other 'acceptable' products that change the look of ships (and characters). This has been repeated ad nauseum in this thread and you haven't been able to address it: why are Super Wing Commander, Wing Commander Academy, the various internal game designs that contradict eachother or their manuals, etc. okay when the movie is not?
"Ship aesthetics" is a silly claim because it's not something that's *ever* been enforced. It's 'wrong' here because you don't like the movie, not because you have an actual issue with it.
the technology thats ten years too early,
I'm not really sure what this is in reference to. You'll have to - gasp, I know it's the death knell of argument in cases like this - be specific.
the total shift in character personal and interpersonal relationships between Blair/Angel, Blair/Maniac,Blair/Tolwyn,Blair/Paladin,Tolwyn/Blairs dad,
These range from silly (the idea of Maniac and Blair attending the Academy and being friends comes from many earlier sources) to absolutely idiotic (we'd never even heard of Blair's dad before the movie.
Blair in the original game didn't interact with characters *at all*. He listened to them tell him about tactics. Letting him talk to them is not a contradiction. You have created a scenario in your brain that Blair being friends with Paladin or in a squadron commanded by Angel contradicts. You need to let this go - it's not a contradiction if the thing it's contradicting is your own assumption.
the fact that Confed was supposedly unprepared for war with the Cats despite the fact that they had to launch TWO fleets against the pilgrims just a few years prior to hostlities with the Kilrathi.
And here's a good example of your personal judgement getting in the way of actual thought. Who says Confed was 'unprepared for war'? A tie in novel by someone who never even played the games. Who says Confed fought a small civil war? Chris Roberts, the guy in charge of the series (actually, Dr. Forstchen also references such fights in Action Stations, but that is not germain to this point.)
You're picking a novel over something written, directed, produced, etc. by Chris Roberts because you like it more. That's not remotely objective.