Originally posted by $tormin
not every question. for instance, why is that mushroom growing out of your nose?
Originally posted by mpanty
IIRC, Admiral Thrawn. Colonel Halcyon was the Wing Commander...
Whooops! Did I mix universes here?Originally posted by Raptor
Thrawn is dead. He died a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away.Originally posted by mpanty
IIRC, Admiral Thrawn. Colonel Halcyon was the Wing Commander...
Originally posted by Bandit LOAF
Some more support for the single Iason theory...
- According to the Handbook, Iason was commissioned in 2613 (long before the first encounter with the Kilrathi), and *refitted* in 2633! A few scant years after the first incident -- quelle coincidence!
- The Captain is called "Jedora Andropolos" only in the little box with specs/info about the ship. She's referred to as just Captain Andropolos everywhere else... and she's a *woman* -- whereas Jedora Andropolos circa 2629 was a man <G> The point being that it's quite possible that it's simply another person named Andropolos -- since it can't be the *same* person, and since the 'facts' box may refer to the *original* captain.
Originally posted by Bandit LOAF
(Which is to say, this thread was nice and pleasant until you started being stupid. Say it with me now... DON'T BE STUPID!)
I wasn't being stupid. This is a chat zone. I was discussing and arguing MY point. There can no discussion if everyone agrees now can there?
If you start branding people 'stupid' for bringing their points across and state their points as void, whats the point of CZ?
Now with regards to there being no second Iason, but it actually being a refit of the first. That is more credible than two 'separate' Iasons.
I wasn't being stupid. This is a chat zone. I was discussing and arguing MY point. There can no discussion if everyone agrees now can there?
Originally posted by Bandit LOAF
I notice you didn't quote yourself -- perhaps there's a recognizable difference between putting across a point and saying, oh, "To all those that subscribe to this idea, that I must say that if you can expect the reasonable man to believe that trash, its insulting to my intelligence." I'll let Frosty drive this point home, since it's what he does best.
Perhaps you are missing the point. My thoughts will not be dictated to me as if I was a child. By saying that there were two, whilst dismissing my opinion as my own, I thought insulting to my intelligence. The thing is, we all have our own opinions, and if one were to dictate others as being THE RIGHT way of doing things, there is no point in a chatzone. We should argue our points, not dictate rules regarding 'contested' WC events.
Shall we just agree to disagree?
Quit using "whilst" to make yourself seem smarter, because it actually makes you seem stupid and arrogant. The fact is, that word was never intended for use as a replacement for “while,” which is the word you should’ve placed there. That you don't recognize this leads me to believe that you're an intellectual poseur.Originally posted by redwolf
Perhaps you are missing the point. My thoughts will not be dictated to me as if I was a child. By saying that there were two, whilst dismissing my opinion as my own, I thought insulting to my intelligence.
I must say; your vaunted intelligence must be easily offended.To all those that subscribe to this idea, that I must say that if you can expect the reasonable man to believe that trash, its insulting to my intelligence.
Perhaps you are missing the point. My thoughts will not be dictated to me as if I was a child. By saying that there were two, whilst dismissing my opinion as my own, I thought insulting to my intelligence. The thing is, we all have our own opinions, and if one were to dictate others as being THE RIGHT way of doing things, there is no point in a chatzone. We should argue our points, not dictate rules regarding 'contested' WC events.
Shall we just agree to disagree?
[/B]