Originally posted by Penguin
So what you're saying is its better to stay in wartime to avoid some unemployment? And how does staying on a permanent wartime footing make it easier for the civilians to regain control from the military?
The second argument is flawed. If someone loses a war, its usually not because of some genetic predisposition, but more a question of tactics, weapons and organization. If we say the Kilrathi really are superior, then why did it take them nearly 40 years to break us? All those martial prowess and they still needed to trick us with the False Truce to win. Oh yeah - having Hobbes as they're mole sure didn't hurt their war effort. The Kilrathi certainly did have a few lucky breaks in that last year didn't they?
Cheap win? What the hell is so cheap about blowing up their homeworld? Hell it got them to surrender when they probably still had the resources to carry on the fight so who is superior now?
First off-no, I'm not saying that-don't get so defensive when there is only clarification. I'm saying that was Tolwyn's arguement, and it did have some merit-although not realistically feasable. And no-it DOESN'T make it any easier to take control back, very good. That's exactly was WC4 was about.
Actually, they didn't need to trick us with the False Truce. That was simply to continue to hide their super carriers. While the strikes the Confederation was playing out was doing fair damage-that was only to the supply of the front lines, since so much was being diverted to the super carriers. Assuming it wasn't, those raids wouldn't have done shit.
Based on your last statement, I'd still say the Kilrathi were more superior at that time. They still had a much more outstanding military than us, and could have still easily crushed the Confederation in a massive push. Taking out the Emperor gave mankind the only path to victory they had available to them-that's why it was formed. As for being cheap-think of it this way, if the Kilrathi had destroyed Earth in the BoT, and we gave up, don't you think that we would have called it a "cheap win." (That's assuming they used a "super weapon" or bioweapon, like we did.)
Originally posted by Stunner
Skyfire: The fact that we took out the royal family, gave us a "cheap win." That's why many people, like Tolwyn, see humanity as the "more flawed species."
Well if we would have used the behemoth would you have been happier then? Instead of destroying part of the planet it would have been reduced to small chucks and dust. And possible alot more planets then the test and Kilrah.
Once again, I'm going to have to ask everyone to STOP trying to decide that I'm pro-Tolwyn, when I'm simply clarifying. But, to answer that, I still would have (going the Tolwyn route) seen it as a cheap win. Even Tolwyn did, that's why he rushed it, and called it a last resort. It's not actually an "honorable" fight, like he had wanted it to be, where man would have won-he was opting for the only, and incidentaly more devious, method by which to win.
~So after all this, I still agree with Wildshots expression of Tolwyn's beliefs-as both of us are not stating that they are our own. (So you can stop the moral high ground act.) They're both accurate, and fairly reasonable-from Tolwyn's perspective.