http://www.gamesindustry.biz/content_page.php?aid=32922
uve all read this right? does this meanzzexpeczzumtzzfromloafzz
uve all read this right? does this meanzzexpeczzumtzzfromloafzz


This is EA's planned campaign to sell things like Red Alert 3 -- not some amazing admission of guilt. It's absolutely stunning that everyone sees vast conspiracies where there are none (EA BOUGHT THE FOOTBALL LICENSE AGAIN? THEY MUST BE PLANNING TO DESTROY NEPTUNE!) but is absolutely duped by something as cheap as this into doing exactly what the PR people want in the first place (repeating this story.)I agree with you Loaf. When I heard this, I saw right through this PR rubbish. There is no way they will actually not stifle the creativity of developers. There have to be deadlines and limited budgets and intrusion into the "corporate culture" or whatever.
Does the internet actually think that a major industry keynote is some accidental off the cuff thing that some maverick hero reporter happened to overhear for us? Wow, stop the presses, I just snuck into Macworld and can reveal the amazing truth: Steve Jobs would like you to buy an iPhone! Repeat it as often as possible, it's hard core!
Yes, at the end of the day this is *probably* good news -- it's a new marketing campaign to sell games like Red Alert... and the fact that Origin was mentioned gives me hope that Wing Commander X is another portion of the same plan.
(Speaking of which, can you believe there are three AAA Command and Conquer games announced in development? C&C3 didn't exactly set any sales records... what we need is for EA to get that same 'spark' for Wing Commander.)
(Speaking of which, can you believe there are three AAA Command and Conquer games announced in development? C&C3 didn't exactly set any sales records... what we need is for EA to get that same 'spark' for Wing Commander.)
I truly hope EA doesn't use Arena as a major part of their decision making with regards to a new WC.
While WC PC games have often required new or upgraded computers, I can at least justify that cost with regards to utility in a way I couldn't with a 360.
A 360 at $350 is not "well-equipped."
It is not capable of outputting an HD DVD format of any kind without further purchase.
Regardless, a 360 is a gaming platform and a growing media center. I can justify spending $400 to upgrade a computer to new standards, as it is still capable of being a functional tool.
I wish 360 had helped win the HD optical war, as it is more appealing to me for a number of reasons, and that feature would have helped me justify the overall cost.
The XBox 360 actually has quite an extensive digital HD library right out of the box. For a few dollars each, you can download high definition versions of hundreds of movies to play off the machine. But I don't see that really being a factor here. You can easily spend twice the cost of an XBox turning a vanilla computer into a gaming machine and not have HDDVD/Blu-ray playback on it there either.