Jason_Ryock said:
Seriously, why is this game so hyped? If you want to play as a Jedi, go buy Jedi Outcast. Not only is it cheaper, it gives you alot more options. If you want to fly a Fighter, go buy X-Wing Alliance. Not only is it cheaper, it gives you alot more options. If you want to play as a standard trooper, go buy Battlefront I. In fact, you can get all three of those games for less then the total cost of Battlefront II, and they do everything Battlefront II does....but they do it better.
Thats the dumbest, most askew peice of logic I've ever heard. Admittedly, maybe I shouldn't be expecting more given the person who posted, but I'd like to think that everyone here has two brain cells and a synapse that fires off when a thought enters their brain.
The point of the game is much the same of Battlefield - to give an Unreal Tournament game a "wider" range of combat. Yes, there are games that are more historically accurate (snicker) than Battlefield as well as games that specificly center on flight (SWotL) or ground battles (Brothers In Arms) - but how about a basic shooter giving you lots of eye candy and the ability to run around in a crazy enviroment in the middle of a giant battle?
Not to mention, Battlefront 2 will drop in price later down the line. Wheres you logic then?
Jason_Ryock said:
This would be, to put it in comarable terms, if Origin released a new flight simulator, with a brand spanking new engine with all the bells and whistles and said, "Here you go, Wing Commander Six!" And gave it exactly the same plot as WCP.
If you're playing a game like Battlefront for the
plot, you need to get your braincase checked.
Jason_Ryock said:
There's hardly any new substance to the game - unless you count the playable Jedi and the Space battles - and everything you knew (and loved) about Battlefront I has been tweaked to adjust the "playability" and "restory" game balance.
So wait - you just said that they're dishing out the same stuff to us but they're also not allowed to add new things or fix problems with the previous entry?
This is one of those stupid paradoxical questions that Kirk would ask the Enterprise computer to make it explode.
Jason_Ryock said:
Apparently, they even failed to accomplish that as this game plays MUCH more difficult then the original Battlefront I.
How does higher difficulty = bad game? Some of the toughest games I've played have been the best - Wing Commander, Final Fantasy Tactics, Contra III as well as others.
Jason_Ryock said:
What they've done here is released a Mediocre game, with the Star Wars Logo on it that's made people buy it. This game is of the same quality of Battlegrounds. Anyone remember Battlegrounds? It's a Star Wars reskin of Age of Empire.
I get the feeling you're masturbating at us using someone else's arguement. Something rings absolutely hollow with that last statement.
Maj.Striker said:
Unbalanced you say? Yes, the fighters were difficult to control (at least on the xbox it was) and you would spend more time trying to take out one guy then if you just selected a standard trooper and mowed through ten guys. You could get in a tank and take out 70 guys in a game easily.
Ill be the first to say that Battleground and its sequel are really PC games; the console versions don't do well with the console controllers and theres a lot lost in the translation. I wouldn't know about playing online - if I wanted to be around jerks, I'd log onto the internet and go to GamingForce or an AOL Chat Room.
All this being said, Battlefront 2 is a fun little game. I'm not so pleased with the addition of Jedi characters because the point of the game is to play as an anonymous soldier in a major battle, not Ewan McGreggor. Also, the game sorely needs a joystick patch for the space levels.