Mekt-Hakkikt
Mpanty's bane
Well, in "reality" of the WC universe you're probably right, 'cause there are also things that aren't simulated in the game, like jamming guns, problems with systems/shields etc... . Heck, in the novel three Dralthi IVs give Blair and Hobbes a problem in a TBolt .
But I was talking purely gamewise.
You know what: Here's my list of superfighters in the respective WC games,whether it interest you or not :
WC1: None
WC2: None in the basic game, maybe the Wraith from WCA. (The Morningstar and Crossbow are close, but they both have real disadvantages so don't classify as superfighters in my eyes)
Armada: Gladius (arguably)
WC3: Excalibur
WC4: Dragon (the superfighter) and the Bearcat (also very very super when looked on the paper., flying those things is awful because of the gun placement.)
WCP: Vampire
BTW: Many here tell me that the Exacl's armour was really thin. Now in the manual it has 110cm of armour front/back and 110cm on the sides, absolutely comparable to the TBolt. I know that mnauals don't always tell the truth but even in the game I never felt that the Excal's armour was inferior to that of the TBolt. Was it?
But I was talking purely gamewise.
You know what: Here's my list of superfighters in the respective WC games,whether it interest you or not :
WC1: None
WC2: None in the basic game, maybe the Wraith from WCA. (The Morningstar and Crossbow are close, but they both have real disadvantages so don't classify as superfighters in my eyes)
Armada: Gladius (arguably)
WC3: Excalibur
WC4: Dragon (the superfighter) and the Bearcat (also very very super when looked on the paper., flying those things is awful because of the gun placement.)
WCP: Vampire
BTW: Many here tell me that the Exacl's armour was really thin. Now in the manual it has 110cm of armour front/back and 110cm on the sides, absolutely comparable to the TBolt. I know that mnauals don't always tell the truth but even in the game I never felt that the Excal's armour was inferior to that of the TBolt. Was it?