Search results

Kay, well do. By the way... Here's an early shot of the Galaxy.

Does Loaf check this forum? Or should I repost the question in general?

I've been making a 3D model of the Galaxy from Privateer, and I think I've been doing a decent job, however there's a few angles which I have no idea what they look like. Notably the bottom, and rear quarters. Does anyone have any referrence pics of this ship?

It could be flight ops in addition to a giant sensory object. Like have the LSO there in addition to a few senior flight officers. The area does make sense for a sensor/radar emplacement as well, since it does have a rather good field of view.

A hornet And a Confed class dread..

Obviously not? I own one.

Umm.... The PS2 is equipped with a 128-bit Emotion Engine RISC Core. Although it's "only" clocked at 300Mhz, It's not A.Slowed down by clutered legacy ISA(x86), B.Has FAR more bandwidth than your average PC system and C.Has a shorter pipeline, which allows it to process more ops per cycle. If...

Just from first hand experience, the PS2 is a nice system. Comes with a lot of expandability options as well. DVD is actually fairly good(yes, better than what you'd get with most players, although it is umm....software...) graphics are damn nice(and no, the Dreamcast comes nothing close to...

How about you try reading his post first? He's asking for voice files from WCIII and WCIV, and is asking what format they're in. That doesn't sound like a tech support question to me.....

Probably close to "For good" or for something like "The forseeable future". They also laid off most if not all the teams that were involved with anything other than UO series games....

Hmm not to try and insult anyone...... But it seems like every "die-hard" WC fan is getting into the "We did it first so everyone else is a copycat" type mentality over newer games....rather shallow. So Starlancer won't be 100% original. It's part of a Wing Commander "mold" so to speak. So...

I would think 256 ships per region in four regions would be enough.... Though that's a best case scenario for the XWA one....(That is if I can find the fricken lock on the ship on screen limit). Otherwise it'd be 96 ships of various sizes(well more like a hundred), in four unique "regions"...

hmm.... "You can make people for free, but fighters cost money"-Cheif tech to Lt.Olivier Poplin Hyperion Flagship 13th Fleet(Okay that's from an anime, not a WC referrence, so no flames or telling me there's no 13th fleet or anything, please.....) Anyway having multiple pilots per ship sounds...

Superb installment as always. Confirmation, the Paladin in these stories looks like the WC2 era one right?(Boy head of covert ops must be a tough and stressful job if he gains so much weight in the course of about a year and a half ) Otherwise I sorta doubt he'd actually be in any shape to be...

Yeah and as I said logistical reasons too. I'd rather be better off knowing I can keep 40 fighters in the air(or rather in space) with appropriately rested pilots, rather than let my pilots have a couple of their own "personal" fighters to use and only getting 10 pilots per shift. Continuious...

Not like a modern day example would help, but usually there's about 1.2-1.3 times the number of pilots than there are planes. One reason obviously being that a pilot isn't going to be available to fly 24 hours a day. Technically it would be more efficient, as you could have more fighters on...

Well.... First, as the Wasp IS a short range interceptor, it wouldn't really make sense for a ship to stock up on so many of em. Better off having more multirole versatile craft. As it is they have rather low endurance(the Black Wasp doesn't count, it's not a mass production model ship.) and...

Yeah that's what I meant. I guess I could've worded it a bit better.... BTW A Rapier G model(for the XWA WCTC) had about 200 quadrangle faces(400 or so polys) for the "base" and 434 faces(800 polys or so) for the "exterior"(high detail model with visible pilot and such). The Rapier G is...

Good textures only help to a point..and only then in lower resolutions...higher reses make it harder to "get away" with using textures for certain details.

Depending on your needs...you can cross off the monitor, so that the totaly price comes down to 1800CAN. Currently you can get up to 700 Mhz processors for dirt cheap(not a whole lot more than 300Mhz.....) so you really shouldn't worry about clockspeed, and get at least a 600 which should last...