Which is the most dangerous flying pancake?

Whats the most dangerous flying pancake

  • Dralthi MK I

    Votes: 3 8.1%

  • Dralthi MK II

    Votes: 16 43.2%

  • Dralthi MK III

    Votes: 2 5.4%

  • Dralthi MK IV

    Votes: 8 21.6%

  • The ones we eat of course! Not good for health at all...

    Votes: 5 13.5%

  • Damn, can pancakes fly?! Wont eat anymore of them fore awhile...

    Votes: 3 8.1%
  • Total voters
    37
the mark IV looked most impressive.... but any dralthi was easily shot to pieces, when compared to the other fighters...
 
The Dralthi is a formidable fighter in the ccg. Cheap to produce.. not too tough on its own, but a very solid team in pairs (equal support to a Vaktoth).
 
Mace said:
the mark IV looked most impressive.... but any dralthi was easily shot to pieces, when compared to the other fighters...
Click to expand...

Kilrathi seem to have a problem building fighters with small outlines from all sides. The Bloodfang Mk2 is probably one of their best design just for the fact that it doesn't have a really big cross section like the drathli and vaktoth. Even darkets when attacked from above provide a nice big target.
 
I'm not clear on whether there are separate "marks" of the Bloodfang and the Strakha - they look different between WC2 and WC3, but I don't think any official source has ever actually claimed that they're unrelated designs.
 
... for the same reason the Air Force doesn't have an inventory consisting entirely of A-1 Airplanes?

(They're different fighters, so they have different names.)

(A-1 Airplanes go good with steak.)
 
Bandit LOAF said:
... for the same reason the Air Force doesn't have an inventory consisting entirely of A-1 Airplanes?

(They're different fighters, so they have different names.)

(A-1 Airplanes go good with steak.)
Click to expand...

Then how do u justify the Dralthis in WC 3?
 
Um, no. Your initial comment was that the Drakhri was a renamed Dralthi, which is incorrect. Although both are medium Kilrathi fighters and share a similar appearance, that doesn't make them the same ship, just like, for example the F4F Wildcat and F6F Hellcat are totally different fighters, even though they share a similar general shape and purpose.
 
The Drakhri and the Dralthi are different fighters, so they have different names. The Krant and the Dralthi are different fighters, so they have different names. I'm not really sure if there's any way to further explain this.
 
Death said:
Um, no. Your initial comment was that the Drakhri was a renamed Dralthi, which is incorrect. Although both are medium Kilrathi fighters and share a similar appearance, that doesn't make them the same ship, just like, for example the F4F Wildcat and F6F Hellcat are totally different fighters, even though they share a similar general shape and purpose.
Click to expand...

F4F was actually a Grumman, Wildcats were a different line of fighters.

Also, yeah and the Dralthi Mark I is different from the Dralthi Mark IV, my point is why didnt they just make it a Dralthi mark II for WC 2?
 
Grumman was a company, it designed the F4F Wildcat and the F6F Hellcat.

Also, yeah and the Dralthi Mark I is different from the Dralthi Mark IV, my point is why didnt they just make it a Dralthi mark II for WC 2?
Click to expand...

Because they're NOT THE SAME FIGHTER. The Dralthi is different from the Drakhri for the same reason that it's different from the Krant, the Scimitar, the Fralthra, the Tiger's Claw and some apples.
 
Oh yeah, I meant to ask you, you said in an Earlier thread which fighter the Rapier from the movie resembles... looking at the Blue Devil Squadrons Handbook... You dont think it bears more of a Resemblance towards either the F4U Corsair or possibly the F6F?
 
What I said was that it *was* a British Lightning jet - that's what they built the set out of.

I personally think it looks lot like a Corsair.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top