Nomad Terror
Rear Admiral
if you could get something to punch through the thing's shields I would rather target something of more tactical importance than some structural beams
LeHah said:I dunno. Structural beams tend to be important to, you know, the structure.
LeHah said:Yes, because in war the enemy just sits around for a couple of minutes, sipping tea and eating bree while you choose what part of a ship to hit.
Chernikov said:Discovery using bomb propulsion? I think I remember using overly large reactors that required distance, but not much about masses of bombs going off back there.
COuldnt the Concordia be considered a Battleship?
Bandit LOAF said:I don't think it's anywhere near that easy to say what would destroy a Plunkett -- size is no indicator of strength in a ship designed to operate in zero gravity... the so-called "weak" points may be solid durasteel beams, versus the "fat" parts are environment areas full of oxygen and munitions.
Dyret said:The "vulnerable" sections are probably just a few corridors wrapped in thee times as much armor as the "big" sections.