Stealth my personal review

Status
Not open for further replies.

Shaggy

Vice Admiral
Unrealistic as hell but rather enjoyable. :D
I enjoyed it a lot, although the Talon fighters seemed a little odd. hen they go hyper sonic their wings sweep forward, so leading lifting edge is now covered. So it's unrealistic in that sense but it had some really cool explosions and some pretty good shots, one in particular that I don't want to spoil but it rather reminded me of an accordion.
Any other opinions?
 
I saw it a week ago, quite a few BUD/S trainees got free tickets for the sneak premier at the Naval Air Station near the Naval Special Warfare Center here. It wasn't too bad.
 
psych said:
I saw it a week ago, quite a few BUD/S trainees got free tickets for the sneak premier at the Naval Air Station near the Naval Special Warfare Center here. It wasn't too bad.

Are you able to say where you are? (I'm just curious, as I was on the base in Norfolk for a wedding last weekend.)

Glad to see people liked Stealth... it looks like a fun movie. I kind of wish it had real airplanes instead of the futuristic-ones, though... I think the man v. machine idea would come across more clearly if the men were flying aircraft we had some attachement to.
 
Well there's the SU-37 Super Flanker, but they called them Terminators :p
And there is a brief appearance of the F\A-18.
Aside from the unrealistic weapons loads on the Talons and EDI The Flankers were shown with plenty of missiles, albiet a realistic interceptor loadout. Unlike films like Iron Eagle where you see an F-16 fly over with six mavericks on the wings and yet is still capable of drop Mk 82 bombs. :D
 
Hrm. I suppose it gets better then. I watched the first 4 minutes of it and felt my IQ dropping.

Good to know though.
 
No chance I'll see it in theaters, but it seems like I movie I'll like down the line.
 
Nice movie. The actors' performance was pretty solid, and I really the idea about the future of warfare... about issues of what makes human fighting a war different from a machine doing the same thing.

But the plot twists and ending was very unexpected. Really like how it came too.

I also love the last line in the movie :-)
 
Ridgerunner said:
If machines are doing the fighting, there is no valor, no honor.

Honor left the battlefield the first day that victory mattered - the honorable guy's usually the one who gets shot in the back when he turns to allow a fallen foe a graceful exit. :D
 
Ridgerunner said:
If machines are doing the fighting, there is no valor, no honor.

i can not say i can see what kind of honor that lays in killing :mad: . If u ask me there are non honour or valor in war, it just things the generals and leaders have made up.......
 
Fenris Ulven said:
i can not say i can see what kind of honor that lays in killing :mad: . If u ask me there are non honour or valor in war, it just things the generals and leaders have made up.......

I totally understand the concept of defending those who cannot defend themselves. That's honor and valor (As long as they're not defending murderers and rapists).

Now to quote wc4, "There's no damn honor in just poking someone in the eye."
 
AD said:
I totally understand the concept of defending those who cannot defend themselves. That's honor and valor (As long as they're not defending murderers and rapists).

Now to quote wc4, "There's no damn honor in just poking someone in the eye."

true, but that’s a argument often used by those who defend murders and rapists ,who cant defend them self. I think it is to the best, that stronger country like USA, don’t get to much involved in conflicts outside their own country.
well, USA is not the best example since they only get bothered with conflicts that has something with oil to do....
:rolleyes:

anyway this is alittle off-topic, sorry.

Where in Wc4 is that quote from?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top