
Originally posted by Mekt-Hakkikt
Wow, that's awesome!![]()
The drawing of the Snakeir is very very neat. Though some of the stats aren't what I expected, at least we now have some canonical data.
Hehe, neither 103m nor 1,003m is correct for the Sivar dreadnought.![]()


Originally posted by Mekt-Hakkikt
No questioning that.
Still, those specs, they are now official, aren't they. They were meant to be included in the manual after all.

Originally posted by Bandit LOAF
It's from CGW, not PC Gamer... and there *is* a picture for the Star Post.
Hooray, a nice compromise at 550m.Originally posted by Mekt-Hakkikt
...neither 103m nor 1,003m is correct for the Sivar dreadnought.

What manual had 103m listed for the Sivar?Originally posted by Bandit LOAF
To be fair, something printed in a manual is probably more canon than something printed in CGW.
I second that.Originally posted by TC
I've changed my mind on my previous post. It's something that was released by Origin and therefore should be considered official in the context of a Joan's Fighting Spacecraft update.
Great work!Originally posted by TC
Secondly, I've released a Claw Marks update including these statistics: http://www.blacklance.org/claw/
A very nice compromise indeedOriginally posted by Wedge009
Hooray, a nice compromise at 550m.
.
.I agree with both (its a nice compromise and the spelling).Originally posted by Quarto
A very nice compromise indeed.
TC, it's a Snakeir, not a Snakier.

Ah, I'll definitely take the PC Claw Marks (even if they were eventually cut) stats over the SWC manual.Originally posted by Bandit LOAF
The Super Wing Commander manual.

Hey, LOAF, I know BL.org has only just moved, but were these pictures only temporary, and can they be put up again?Originally posted by Bandit LOAF
![]()