frostytheplebe
Seventh Part of the Seal
So i know this has been hacked nearly to death (After this, it will most likely be to death.)
I would just like to reopen the discussion of the theory (or was it accepted canon?) that the Concordia split in two either on entry into the atmosphere or on impact.
There is evidence both ways if you ask me, but of lot of this is based on assumption, so let's examine what we can, shall we?
For starters, I'm will to chalk this up to a misguestimate, but the Concordia appears to be less then a mile out on the Minstral Coast. IF she came down intact, that would indicate a massive drop off pretty close to the shore. This is something that is not unheard of on earth, but not really common for one that deep so close to the shore.
Then again, this isn't Earth.
Does that prove anything one way or another? Not really...
So where do we go from there?
Let's make a few assumptions, JUST FOR ARGUMENT'S SAKE!
Blair and Paladin weren't wearing gravity boots or have some sort of mystical enviornmental field around them, at least none that were ever mentioned.
So with that in mind, it does appear that Vespus has similar Gravity, and similar atmosphere. How do we deduce this? Blair and Paladin are breathing normally, and their cloaks are slightly blowing in the breeze. Also, we see fire errupting from the Concordia. So something allows for these conditions to be met.
COULD they possibly be a different set of elements combined and Blair and Paladin COULD be able to breathe for a short time on the planet, but if exposed for too long could be poisoned by the atmosphere, we've seen that before in other various sci fi movies and games.
But, wild theories aside, let's stick with the assumption that this was meant to be a habitable world. With gravity similar to Earth.
Why is this important? Look at the way the Concordia is slanted. If she were split in half, all the weight would be distributed to the forward section where the PTC, the radar housing, and gun turrets are. With that theory, would the Concordia be able to stay upright like that? If she sank enough into mud on the ocean floor, maybe, but unlikely even then. Plus if you look at the terrain, its rocky instead of sand and mud.
There is also the theory that the debris we see off to the right of Concordia is in fact the other half that split off. Honestly, I find that difficult to believe. The debris is way to close to the front half and too small in size to be the correct piece.
So where is the other half if it did break in half?
Well There are a few explanations:
1. It broke apart and burnt up in on entry.
2. It broke up upon crashing and spread all over the sea.
3. It's off screen.
So this is just the priliminary piece. Let's open up the floor for debate on this one. Anyone who wishes to add more evidence/info/wild theories, please do.
My opinion: The Concordia did not break apart on entry. It did not break up when she hit. My best estimate is that she landed mostly intact, sank into the sea and that is how she is remaining upright for the time being.
The best I can fathom is that the lack of apparent distance from the shore is either explained by an error on the artist's part, or a massive drop off right off shore.
I would just like to reopen the discussion of the theory (or was it accepted canon?) that the Concordia split in two either on entry into the atmosphere or on impact.
There is evidence both ways if you ask me, but of lot of this is based on assumption, so let's examine what we can, shall we?
For starters, I'm will to chalk this up to a misguestimate, but the Concordia appears to be less then a mile out on the Minstral Coast. IF she came down intact, that would indicate a massive drop off pretty close to the shore. This is something that is not unheard of on earth, but not really common for one that deep so close to the shore.
Then again, this isn't Earth.
Does that prove anything one way or another? Not really...
So where do we go from there?
Let's make a few assumptions, JUST FOR ARGUMENT'S SAKE!
Blair and Paladin weren't wearing gravity boots or have some sort of mystical enviornmental field around them, at least none that were ever mentioned.
So with that in mind, it does appear that Vespus has similar Gravity, and similar atmosphere. How do we deduce this? Blair and Paladin are breathing normally, and their cloaks are slightly blowing in the breeze. Also, we see fire errupting from the Concordia. So something allows for these conditions to be met.
COULD they possibly be a different set of elements combined and Blair and Paladin COULD be able to breathe for a short time on the planet, but if exposed for too long could be poisoned by the atmosphere, we've seen that before in other various sci fi movies and games.
But, wild theories aside, let's stick with the assumption that this was meant to be a habitable world. With gravity similar to Earth.
Why is this important? Look at the way the Concordia is slanted. If she were split in half, all the weight would be distributed to the forward section where the PTC, the radar housing, and gun turrets are. With that theory, would the Concordia be able to stay upright like that? If she sank enough into mud on the ocean floor, maybe, but unlikely even then. Plus if you look at the terrain, its rocky instead of sand and mud.
There is also the theory that the debris we see off to the right of Concordia is in fact the other half that split off. Honestly, I find that difficult to believe. The debris is way to close to the front half and too small in size to be the correct piece.
So where is the other half if it did break in half?
Well There are a few explanations:
1. It broke apart and burnt up in on entry.
2. It broke up upon crashing and spread all over the sea.
3. It's off screen.
So this is just the priliminary piece. Let's open up the floor for debate on this one. Anyone who wishes to add more evidence/info/wild theories, please do.
My opinion: The Concordia did not break apart on entry. It did not break up when she hit. My best estimate is that she landed mostly intact, sank into the sea and that is how she is remaining upright for the time being.
The best I can fathom is that the lack of apparent distance from the shore is either explained by an error on the artist's part, or a massive drop off right off shore.