No it would make the Dragon 40 meters, just because it looks smaller in the game doesn't mean the facts we are given in literature are wrong. Look at the size of the Dragon when Blair lands on Telemon (?) or when its on the Intrepid. The thing is huge.BattleDog said:I still don't believe the WC3-4 fighters are that big. If they are how come an Excal looks smaller than a Vamp?
Since the Vamp is bigger in game that must mean one sive stat is wrong.
Making a comparison I'd put the Excal at 16-18 metres long, or the Vamp at 28-34 metres long.
So that would make the Dragon 20 metres, not so big.
Comparison? We are given how big a Excal, Dragon, Vamp, etc are, why do we have to compare them to find a size?
Different armor. What you see on the WC3 fighters and on is a "durasteel-equivalent" thickness, IIRC. The Tigers Claw had Durasteel Armor, when the Victory was refitted sometime in its operational life, it ws given a different type of armor that is measured in a Durasteel equivalent thickness, same goes for the fighters. The armor may actually be a few centimeters thick, but its as strong a 80cm (in teh cse of the Arrow) of durasteel. I think this is your explaination, if not, I'll be corrected and punished .BattleDog said:The Tiger claw which was suposidly made after the victory only had 25cm of armor while even an arrow has 80 cm so there is some crossover problems.