TC/I'm thinkin...: Personally I felt a direct assault on Ella was easier than fighting past the capships and their escorts. Since Blair needed to intercept Tolwyn ASAP he had to take the chance that offered the best probability of success.
mpanty: I believe Blair was operating on the basis of I'll deal with the Vesuvius, when I get to it. Anyways doesn't standard operating procedure dictate, that when attacking a carrier with an open hangar, you fly into the hangar? Once inside the carrier, the weapon you're using ought to be irrelevant.
Junior: Its true that Blair didn't know that Tolwyn would corroborate him, and indeed Tolwyn's stuffup cost him everything. However Blair had to convince the senate. That's the priority. Therefore he had to do everything in his power to get there in time. That necessity, coupled with the "grave and irrevocable" matter the senate was deliberating on, is what gives Blair some justification to seriously consider attacking Ella, as a means to reach the senate.
Finally with regards to Ella. Destroying Ella is something that would probably haunt Blair, like the destruction of Kilrah, for the rest of his life. It probably would permanently damage his reputation. But Tolwyn's activities amounted to a more serious issue then Blair's credibility, in spite of Ella. Now if you guys feel fighting past Ella, as opposed to destroying it, is easier, or simply the only alternative, then you're either better pilots, or less ruthless then I am.