So, the only reason people rated this game so low (on amazon) is because of the copy protection used? IGN gave it an 8.8, Metacritic an 86, and then the users rate it around a 1 because of DRM. And it would seem there are a ton of blogs and posts about how this horrible DRM and its limit of 3 activations being 'draconian' and blah-blah-blah. Isn't a company entitled to protect their software however they see fit? And shouldn't a person play the game before they actually say 'oh, well I read this review about the DRM and arbitrarily decided to throw a bad review at the game'?
I find it to be a pretty fun game, and I really like the way the users generate the content for the game. It definately makes things more interesting when you're not really sure what you're going to be up against the next time you play.
Brad