Favorite Ships

Edfilho said:
Did I mention that WCP fighters have cloaks and anti-cloak techs?

I'm pretty sure I never saw a single ship cloak in wcp. The only explanation I can think of is maybe all ships had permanent cloaks that hide the ship from radar but don't make it invisible from view. Or maybe the nephilim have some kind x-ray vision that let them see your cloaked ship :D . Other than this, I was under the impression that wcp had completely dropped cloakable ships.
 
this topic has been done a 1000 times before, but is all right, i like this kind of topic, they should make a pool. I like the hellcat, its just to bad it dont have auto slide and havier shield. i must say excal arrow and thud are the three ships i use most. i hate the longbow...
 
To chime in again, I always liked the arrow and the banshee a lot, too. Autoslide was fun, plus I always enjoyed hotrodding around in high-speed light fighters. Sure, the Dragon and Excal were almost as fast, had better weapons, had autoslide, but if they made a massively multiplayer Wing Commander game, I'd probably spend most of my time in an arrow.
 
Well for me, I has to be the Excalibur. I don't know what it is but its just such a great fighter and it looks perfect. Ever since I first saw it, its been my favourite. But I also really like the black Vampire and Black Panther. Great weapons. :) But the Excalibur easily beats them in my books.

But having said that, I REALLY like cap ships! And my favourite within the WHOLE WC series, has to be the Vesuvius. Again, I'm not sure why, but I really like it. Then the Midway. But their very close.
 
Regarding cloaks in WCP: There is a dialogue where Stilletto and Maestro or Zero say they tried to use the cloaks, but it had no effects on the bugs.
 
Edfilho said:
BTW, MiG blah blah blah. No F-15 was ever took down. I don't care if some of you have wet dreams with MiGs and Sukhois. the F-22 has tech enough to be really uber in combat.


Actualy speaking about the techs, MiGs and SUs are the only ships in the world that may do different monuveres that none other aircraft may do. So at this point you are wrong buddy.

You can't really say what ship is Uber, cause those F-15 vs MiG and F-22 vs SU are the ships from one field. F-22 was created as the opponent for SU. If you want to know SU is the more monuverable ship than F-22. F-22 compinsates it by its heavy weaponry. (so what aircraft is uberer in combat? Speed vs Firepower.. hmm difficult to say) It was the USA's answer to SU aircrafts. Pretty nice answer i have to admit. Until there appeared SU-37 "Terminator" . After SU-37 "Terminator" its difficult to say what's better...

Saying that F-22's tech is enough to make it uber ship means that you do nto know much about the aircraft technology and those fighters. Please read some info, you will see that i do not take it from my head. But i have enough background to support me thoughts. But I may guess that media intriduced you F-22 and F-15 as the Uberest aircrafts in the world... that could happen, so ya... you might think so, but that doesn't mean that it's true.

btw, i bet there is one aircraft that USA developes (but i'm not aware of it, but i think its in developing, it has to be!!!), cause if there is none, this ship -> Su-37(41) "Berkut" will become a very very very nice aircraft in the next 2 years. (so far its opponent could be only F-22 at the certain degree)


P.S. no offence was ment

P.S.S. I do not remember about cloaking ships as well.
 
I was doing some reading on globalsecurity.org about the different fighter aircraft and I think that US and Russian fighters have advantages over each other in different areas. According to what I read, US aircraft tend to have an advantage in technology, they can detect and engage enemy aircraft at farther ranges. Russian aircraft however have an advantage close in, they tend to be more maneuverable and the Mig 29 has a helmet mounted sight for IR homiing missiles so the pilot does not have to use his/her HUD.

I think a lot of it comes down to the pilots and their training though.
 
I completly agree with Cyberion. The F-22 is cool, very advanced, plus it's a great fighter, but I think that it will fall second place to the Berkut (Golden Eagle). (BTW-Apparently it's name has been upgraded to the Su-47, something about it entering the next stage.) Its just as advanced as the Raptor, and I pretty sure its more manuvourable. It steathy (using similar material as the Raptor); has internal weapon bays (like the Raptor); is just as fast as the Raptor; and has advanced radar like the Raptor.

Overall, they are actually very similar, and I believe they were both concieved around the same time, the only major difference I believe lies within the area of manuvourablity. The Raptor went with thrust vectoring, the Berkut went with body design. Giving similar results. However, Sukhoi seem to always get it just right. So overall, I think the Berkut will come out on top.

But, being a Brit, I'd just like to slip in that both these planes (around 90% being the Raptor) got a lot of its tech from other sources, including the Typhoon. The main one being supercruise. I fed up and SICK of reading that the Raptor was the first Aircraft to obtain supercruise. As a matter of fact, there have only been 4 aircraft to obtain supercruise, and the Raptor is the 'latest' addition to the list. The first 3 were British. Well, one was part French and the another is European, but the very first supercruise was reached by a P.1 prototype of the English Electric Lightning on August 4, 1954. Next was Concorde, which is now gone. :)() Then the Typhoon, THEN the Raptor.

Sorry I went on a bit but I just wanted to make it very clear. I really am sick of hearing people tell me the Raptor, has all these new and 'really' advanced things, when there not really all that new, and mostly came from other sources.

There, moan finished. :)

p.s. I can't remember that line about cloaking ships either, guess I'll have to play the game again to check. ;)
 
The conversation about cloaks was cut from the final game, for reasons that either weren't explained or I'm simply forgetting.

The jist of the conversation, though, was Stiletto telling Maestro to engage cloak, the bugs saw him, to which he replies that he was cloaked. I don't recall what ship they were in at the time, either.
 
God bless Wedge's site

Stiletto: Just stay cloaked until we work out if they’re friendly.
Maestro: Um… they’re shooting at me. Guess they’re not friendly.
Stiletto: Activate your cloaking device, Maestro!
Maestro: I am using my cloaking device, thank you very much. Must be broken.
Stiletto: Hey! What? They’re shooting at me, too!
Stiletto: Watch it, kids! They can see through our cloaking somehow!
This was from the first mission, escorting Dekker and the Marines to the Fralthi II cruiser. The dialogue apparently was supposed to take place between the "Those aren't Kilrathi fighters" and "Alpha wing, we're taking fire! We're buggin out!" lines.
 
One thing that everyone is overlooking in the Sukoi vs F-22 debate is that the F-22 has stealth capability enabling them to have the first look first shoot capability in the area of BVR combat. The Sukoi may be more maneuverable close in but as far as long range combat they don't have a chance against a flight of F-22s. The F-15 on the otherhand was designed to combat the Mig-25. They had no idea about the limitations of the Mig-25 and designed an aircraft very fast and very nible thus the F-15 was born. The F-15 can hold it's own against Mig-29s and Su-27s. Having Mig-29s and Su-27s didnt help the Iraqis in 1991 they either went across the border to Iran, were blown up on the ground, or went down in flames. The F-22 is a coldwar design meant to locate and shoot down anything in the air that the Soviets could muster without being detected or engaged for that matter.

Also I do remember something about the bugs being able to see through the Confeds Shroud technology.
 
Joker057 said:
One thing that everyone is overlooking in the Sukoi vs F-22 debate is that the F-22 has stealth capability enabling them to have the first look first shoot capability in the area of BVR combat. The Sukoi may be more maneuverable close in but as far as long range combat they don't have a chance against a flight of F-22s. The F-15 on the otherhand was designed to combat the Mig-25. They had no idea about the limitations of the Mig-25 and designed an aircraft very fast and very nible thus the F-15 was born. The F-15 can hold it's own against Mig-29s and Su-27s. Having Mig-29s and Su-27s didnt help the Iraqis in 1991 they either went across the border to Iran, were blown up on the ground, or went down in flames. The F-22 is a coldwar design meant to locate and shoot down anything in the air that the Soviets could muster without being detected or engaged for that matter.

Also I do remember something about the bugs being able to see through the Confeds Shroud technology.


"MiG-29 description"
Here is some info on MiG-29 and the explanation why Iraq, using it was losing. (do not forget that alot depends on the pilot as well).

The Mig-29 is considered to be the first Russian aircraft comparable in quality of design to those in the west. It first became operational in early 1985 and since then has been exported to a number of countries.
Of a size comparable to the F/A 18 Hornet, the design reflected a change in the Russian tactics in the air. The Mig bureau created an aircraft capable of independent action rather than relying on ground control and guidance. The Mig 29 has a high level of manoeuvrability. The coherent pulse Doppler radar (which can track up to 10 targets simultaneously) combined with a laser range finder and infra-red search and track (IRST) device linked to the Helmet Mounted Sight (HMS) make it an excellent dogfighter (still the best dogfight aircraft). Two engines provide for high degree of survivability in combat.
About 345 of these fighters are in service with the Russian tactical air forces and 110 with the naval forces. In Germany, a number of ex-East German Mig-29s remain now in service with the unified Luftwaffe. 19 Mig-29As are used in interception role and 4 Mig-29UB in training. Currently all the Migs are assigned to Staffel 731 of JG 73 based at Laage. One of these machines, 29+12, is a subject of this walkaround.
The East German Migs were Russian export models (the same as any other export model to any other country, including Iraq) and thus are less capable than their Russian counterparts. For example, the engines were downgraded to 90% maximum power. The radar system is less powerful, with detection range reduced to about 40km. Interestingly, even so, these Mig-29s have proven themselves more than capable on practice sorties against F-16 Falcons, defeating them with ease.
Despite of this, it is doubtful that the Migs will remain in Luftwaffe for long. With uncertain supply of spare parts and the extra cost of supporting only one staffel of Russian aircraft, the writing is already on the wall.
Considering Iraq aircraft, I must say that most;y it was MiG-25. If there were MiG-29, than just about 3-4 ships not more.


"Su-27 description"
The Su-27 is a big long-range air superiority fighter, comparable to the U.S. F-15 but superior in many respects. Pulse-Doppler radar (1.076m diameter) provides guaranteed detection of targets (’light fighter’ class) at 80-100km in the front hemisphere and 30-40km in the rear. Radar electronics allows simultaneous tracking of 10 targets and rocket firing against two of those, no matter in ’clear air’ or on ground/sea background.
Opto-electronic tracking system increases reliability of targeting complex and detects high-speed targets at 40km in front hemisphere and at 90-100km in the rear one. Combination of those two allows to track and attack targets ranging from high-speed high-altitude reconnaissaters to low-level compact targets like cruise missiles and drones.
10 hardpoints allow to carry wide variety of AA missiles.
At the beginning of 1996 Russian VVS possessed 450 Su-27, above 300 of those assigned to PVO.

but we may go further and look into SU-35 which already outstands F-22, cause it is advanced derivative of the Su-27 "Flanker". The first Su-27M prototype flew in 1985 and was displayed at the 1992 Farnborough Air Show.
Changes from the Su-27 include a new radar, foreplanes, more powerful engines, an enlarged and improved infrared search and track unit in front of the cockpit, an infrared missile-warning scanner on the fuselage spine and a large "spine" between the engines containing a rearward-facing air-to-air radar, allowing the use of rear-firing missiles mounted on rotating pylons that can fire missiles in either direction.
It's the first aircraft able to make Mach 1.0+ in vertical flight.

And i'm talking right now only about SU-27/35. And not about SU-37 "Terminator" and especialy not about Su-37(47) "Berkut" (GoldenEagle).
I'm not trying to make russian airplanes to look superiour (not at all), i'm just provide the basic background, showing that russian aircrafts do not lose any position to the western analogs. Maybe only at the radar range + that stealth thing, but the most funniest thing is that russian radars always tracked Stealth american ships, always... eheheh and i'm not imagine, but talking about it as a fact. Our airplanes can't track at the long ranges F-117, but onground radar station can. But our aircrafts can track F-22, that's I know for sure.

So ya, you may say that i'm wrong or that i'm a loser, but hey I have facts and the history to prove the competability of the russian aircrafts. And also you have to remember that any aircraft that was outside the USSR, was a downgraded model. But the american ships were the normal models and still russian analogs proved to be the real pain in the ass... just image what could happen if it was the normal models and not downgrated.


But this dispute about the aircraft is useless, cause I saw that russian aircrafts aren't considered as one of the best (or advancier at some parts), mostly thanks to the american multimedia, that described us as stupid, evil people, who live with bears and only drink vodka.

But if someone here got upset that russian aircrafts turned to be rel good, here is a very good news for you, the USA's economy is one of the best and the ubiest comparing to the russian's one ;) We have brains (scientiests), you have money, hmm shall we work together? ;)

Cyb
 
C'mon people, don't fight ove those fighters... Wedon't know what an F22 is capable of, cause it didn't see combat yet. (therse only one squadron equipped with F22! yet) F15's had seen combat, and lost a few too!! A russian will never agree on that their fighters are way too old and way too expensive to keep prepped to combat than most of the american stuff. The systems your scientists think up are way too complex, thus haveing lots of parts that can go wrong. Don't misunderstand! Your scientists are not stupid, they just have to live with your economy/prices. Thus they have to make "advanced" ideas the old fashioned way. On the other hand, american fighters were built for one advantage, and that only (incl. F15) : that they outnumber anything thrown at them!

to CAG: "Gimme my Dragon back, or I'll put a flashpack under yer bad" :D
 
lorddarthvik said:
C'mon people, don't fight ove those fighters... Wedon't know what an F22 is capable of, cause it didn't see combat yet. (therse only one squadron equipped with F22! yet) F15's had seen combat, and lost a few too!! A russian will never agree on that their fighters are way too old and way too expensive to keep prepped to combat than most of the american stuff. The systems your scientists think up are way too complex, thus haveing lots of parts that can go wrong. Don't misunderstand! Your scientists are not stupid, they just have to live with your economy/prices. Thus they have to make "advanced" ideas the old fashioned way. On the other hand, american fighters were built for one advantage, and that only (incl. F15) : that they outnumber anything thrown at them!

to CAG: "Gimme my Dragon back, or I'll put a flashpack under yer bad" :D


:D good point ;) I somewhat agree.
 
Cyberion said:
Actualy speaking about the techs, MiGs and SUs are the only ships in the world that may do different monuveres that none other aircraft may do. So at this point you are wrong buddy.

And those very impressive maneuvers so far have no use whatsoever in air combat. Bell, Cobra, Kubik, etc. Very good for airshows.

You can't really say what ship is Uber, cause those F-15 vs MiG and F-22 vs SU are the ships from one field. F-22 was created as the opponent for SU. If you want to know SU is the more monuverable ship than F-22. F-22 compinsates it by its heavy weaponry. (so what aircraft is uberer in combat? Speed vs Firepower.. hmm difficult to say) It was the USA's answer to SU aircrafts. Pretty nice answer i have to admit. Until there appeared SU-37 "Terminator" . After SU-37 "Terminator" its difficult to say what's better...

The F-15 was the undisputed air king of its time. AFAIK no F-15 was felled by other planes in real combat. It's not the best nowadays, though. The SU-37 is surelly a great project. I hope they can pull it off. The X-29 didn't. I have nothing against the Sukhois and MiGs. But Russia isn't the economic potency it used to be, nor it is as technologicaly paired up with the US as it used to be. The F-22 can shoot and kill other planes before they can see it. It's no use being more maneuverable in this situation. I don't think that ALL air combat will be BVR in the future, there will always be the need to engage dogfights (even the F-22 has a cannon), but The ability to see and kill without being seen and killed is very, very important.

Saying that F-22's tech is enough to make it uber ship means that you do nto know much about the aircraft technology and those fighters. Please read some info, you will see that i do not take it from my head. But i have enough background to support me thoughts. But I may guess that media intriduced you F-22 and F-15 as the Uberest aircrafts in the world... that could happen, so ya... you might think so, but that doesn't mean that it's true.

I know a bit more than you think I do. I surelly didn't desing or manufacture the planes, and I don't know how many newtons can their engines push and so on. But i'm not an ignorant moron who repeats everything someone tells him. I have witnessed some heated debates in onther foruns about these planes, and we can only talk about potencial... But one thing we know: Russian economy is not so hot right now, and the existance of these russian aircraft is not garanteed. It is possible that Sukhoi will go bankrupt or something...

And the media might have told you that pulling aerobatic stunts was the most important thing a fighter can do. That could happen. You might think so, but that doesn't mean it's true.

btw, i bet there is one aircraft that USA developes (but i'm not aware of it, but i think its in developing, it has to be!!!), cause if there is none, this ship -> Su-37(41) "Berkut" will become a very very very nice aircraft in the next 2 years. (so far its opponent could be only F-22 at the certain degree)

Let us talk about this plane after it is operational...

P.S. no offence was ment

none taken

P.S.S. I do not remember about cloaking ships as well.

That was already addressed.

You are comparing current planes with maybe future planes.

Of course the WC3 vaktoth is a lot superior to the rapier2a. But it didn't exist when the rapier2a was introduced, and for a while the rapier was the uber fighter. simple as that.

And I'm no "american fighters" fanboy. I really admire the russian fighters, but nowadays its not just a matter of pure capabilities... We must factor the economical issues as well. Take the MiGs: the MiG design bureau, AFAIK has been shut... The MiG-29 s are being abandoned by most air forces because they are expensive and high maintenances... It's no use making a hell of a plane that no one can afford. Unfortunately the most important air force nowadays is in the US... and they can barely fund and keep their top planes. Budget cuts are all around. The F-14 is being phased out even while it is still the top fighter in its role.

Oh, I really like Eurofighter 2000 and the Tornado, and the Grippen. All pretty planes :)
 
Grippen sux big time :D Our poor country has just recieved the training grippens... and all our pilots are begging for the good ol Migs..

"Bell,Cobra, Cubic, etc" They do work well against all heatseeking missiles though :D
 
lorddarthvik said:
"Bell,Cobra, Cubic, etc" They do work well against all heatseeking missiles though :D

that was the point for creating the aircrafts capable to do such manuevers. And not just for a show ;)


the thing is that F-22 isn't in the mass production (as it was said, there is one wing of such fighters). So we do not know what it will turn out in combat.

As for F-15 it proved that it lost Su-27 and MiG-29 alot during the combats and later tests. The thing i started to defende russian aircraft is cause of the first post. that F-15 and F-22 are the uberest aircrafts. Which is not. I gave examples.

Uber means something almost invulnerable. The only Uber aircraft we may call is F-117, cause there is none analog in any country... but we also would be wrong, cause russian radars and missiles can track that aircraft. So it really depends.

I'm not happy at our economy as well. But hey, only 15 years pasted since governmental change. The USA had it at the end of 19th century. So be kind to us.


well anyway let's stop this useless debate.
 
Reminder: An Iraq soldier shot the F117 with a simple AAA gun. Humans got eyes you know :D And F117 is a pain in da a** to fly. Otherwise its rally an über fighter, not kidding!

Ok,im stopped :)
 
Cyberion said:
that was the point for creating the aircrafts capable to do such manuevers. And not just for a show ;)

Pitty the BVR missiles are radar guided... Again, the SUs are great for dogfighting.


the thing is that F-22 isn't in the mass production (as it was said, there is one wing of such fighters). So we do not know what it will turn out in combat.

But at least one wing has them. While several of the russian super-fighters are not out of research and development phase yet.

As for F-15 it proved that it lost Su-27 and MiG-29 alot during the combats and later tests. The thing i started to defende russian aircraft is cause of the first post. that F-15 and F-22 are the uberest aircrafts. Which is not. I gave examples.

And the MiG-17 kicked the Mustang's ass. The Su-27 is more modern than the F-15.

Uber means something almost invulnerable. The only Uber aircraft we may call is F-117, cause there is none analog in any country... but we also would be wrong, cause russian radars and missiles can track that aircraft. So it really depends.

Not really, in this context, uber means just better than the others. It doesn't mean you need to be the victor 10 out 10 times. Lot's of fighters were "uber" for a short period. Then the other guys made a better one. :) And the F-117 is more of an attack plane, it's supposed to run away from other fighters.

I'm not happy at our economy as well. But hey, only 15 years pasted since governmental change. The USA had it at the end of 19th century. So be kind to us.

It has nothing to do with being "kind", I'm brazillian, we fly freaking Mirages and F-5 Tigers. It's about facts: The US is the top country nowadays, and even in wartime they have difficulties funding the new aerospacial combat techs... Russia is facing many severe problems in the economical area, and cannot fund and buy new fighters as they would like to. I don't believe the US is intrinsecally better than any other place, I don't argue for them regardless of the situation... I just believe that, given the current world situation, they're in a better position to make good fighters. Heck, I was just giving an example of uber fighter.... Forget aboput this debate, just swap the F-15 and F-22 reference to a W-190 and F-4U Corsair one.

Concerning the fallen F-117... do you have any link to a reputable source? I can recall only the one that was shot down in Bosnia... and it was due to stupid mission planning by UN people.
 
Back
Top