LOL I have no problem with evolution. It just seemed like the thread was devolving into flames so I thought I'd get one in. Hellcat warned me people would take me seriously, but oh wellMaj.Striker said:As far as Evolution...haha, well there's too many holes in that theory to make it hold water. I don't got the time or the energy to deflate that balloon. If you want a debate PM and we'll keep it civil.
"If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down."hellcatv said:a good theory, like Darwin's theory, is backed by hell of a lot of evidence that points to it being true
Mjr. Whoopass said:As these scientists say, they could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications.
In fact, eyes corresponding to every stage in this sequence have been found in existing living species.
Scientists in advanced fields of study have discovered numerous examples of "irreducible complexity":
Examples include the bacterial flagellum, the blood clotting mechanism, and the biochemical processes behind vision. Reverse-engineering of these and other biological structures shows that evolutionary processes weren't at work in creating them. As these scientists say, they could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications.
Although Darwin's theory by his own admission "absolutely break(s) down". . .
Corsair(pilot) said:Wow, I really don't mean to offend Maj. Striker, but that is probobaly either the funniest of saddest post I've read in a while. I haven't decided.