Search results

I'm not taking anything personal. Basically, I've had little to do with past decisions on WCU. I've been mostly concentrating on the technical issues, and I want to get sound working right. That's all. But it does amaze me how badly people understand what I'm saying. I mean, I say one...

LOAF, Halman didn't even give precisions. What was I supposed to assume? That is what bothers me. If he had said: You're arrogant in thinking that they would have wanted it to look like what you made it look. Couldn't it have been different? Did you bother doing some research, looking for...

Man... why am I so little understood around here? Everything I say is took the wrong way... let me try to explain. I could argue that. This will sound egocentric at first... read it all before thinking about it. I'm the comunity. You're the comunity. WE are the comunity. Noone fits...

I think I was clear, but just in case: I meant that it's wrong going overboard with realism in anything WC-related. Come on... tell me one reason why you think ships can't be beautified that isn't just fanatism. And I rest my case (shoot to kill) You're the one that was fervently opposed...

Well... you can't go overboard with reality with a WC project, but a little bit of realistic features won't bother me and shouldn't bother you. I mean... you can't tell me the Caernaven (what's the correct spelling anyway?) is graphically perfect and shouldn't be changed... it's simplicity is...

That's true... I remember that. There was a period in which PR's site forwarded you to VegaStrike's. BTW... why did it move? I think it had something to do with PGG, though... I think people here were too strongly biased towards PGG rather than PR's view or something like that.

No, not cancelled. But we moved to sourceforge forums, so unless it's from non-devs, there won't be any activity here - at least, I don't know anyone visiting this forum regularly. And we're in heavy development too... lots of new features, although, unfortunately, a little unstable too...

...or when you wake up trying to figure out whether you have to use the AB or not to get to school in time.

I don't know. Killing that many (the big number I posted) would screw up the kill counter. But I'm not sure that would have an influence on the reps. I think not, it's the act of killing what influences reps, not the kill count. But I could be mistaken. Overflow errors are very hard to track...

I think you would have to kill over 2147483648 of them in the remake.

Same thing here. But my family (most precisely my brothers) are a little... rough. I had to fix it a zillion times. But it keeps coming back together.

Talking about next version... ¿Any idea of what has to be done for the next version? Perhaps I could help with something C-related.

Well, don't be so sad. I was going to add that, anyways. I'll try to remember to add Joystick::RollMode too.

No, that won't work. That was what I was saying... keyboard modifiers will be needed for Inertial Flight, but not implemented as <axis name="z" modifier="something" ../> but as <bind key="x" command="Joystick::DirectThrustMode"/> or even <bind joystick="0" button="3" ...

It should work with AW Infinity. It was probably damaged. Did you try the basic repair?

Just bind the "z" axis, instead of the "throttle" axis. That'll make it roll with the throttle. That is, <axis name="z" joystick="0" axis="2" inverse="false"/>

Yeah, of course. Not possible in VS.

Actually, it's much more complex than that. Asteroids are represented as Units, so they're entangled with the unit management system, and with all its overhead. However, the problem is not controlling asteroid position and rotation. I'm not sure where the problem lies. I was going to do some...

In Palan. Go figure.

You must be using 1.0. I used 1.1 and, besides much easier, the Hunter Demon's were hostile to me already. Try installing 1.1. Or, not... and prepare yourself for one hellish difficult mission. Warning: Backup your saves, along with serialized_xml, before installing. There have been reports...