Search results

They did a fair job in that game of giving it something of a Privateer feel, and when you've got a voice actor like Bruce, that's the way to go!

There is supposed to be a third one, if I'm able to find the info. on it, I'll give it to you guys-but apparently it's supposed to be a lot more like Trigger and Cross. (Which Trigger was the better game, if you ask me-so that works out great.)

Re: Re: WC 6 Plans? I was almost the exact same way, never did like atmosphere combat.

That, and as I seem to recall, on 4 different occasions they've found some sort of WMD/materials there-of. More often than not, they were(or are) off at a lab being tested for that very thing. I fail to see how you just *know* that they're not there, when a group of scientists, and can we use...

Nah, see, that just means that you have to see him as having your personality...and since I kick ass, I know he's great. Ha!

Since it's obvious that Blair was the best, I'm one to always go with my 2nd choice (in these subjects). And my fav. wingman was always Hobbes, before his programming kicked in. (Damn Kilrathi trickery!)

Well, that an the fact that in 3, everything was kinda in the shitter, so I somehow doubt that they'd be as "spit-and-polish" as during, say, 4.

As much as Bush is doing a fair job, in my opinion, there are still things that I disagree with him about, heavily. And, since I'm a member of the party anyways, I'll be voting Liberatarian!

Actually, I'd tend to disagree with that. The French didn't supply as much as people believe during the Revolution. They were just fighting the British in the meantime, so the enemy of my enemy played out to make us stronger allies. And in any event, the war of 1812 didn't have the French giving...

I'm also one who always chose the Arrow, until the Excal was available. But in comparison to some of the other ships I've flown with...:)

Re: Re: Protester Arrested Thanks be to Frosty for bein' around on this one-I don't think I could have stated this any better.

I'm gonna guess that few, if any, people are going to try to say that they want to lose all their freedoms, and maybe their lives in a government that isn't going to be very effective. The only time your going to get people to support your question, is if your not talking world...

Super-fighters would be my favorite...but if I couldn't have one of those, it'd be a tossup between something like the Wasp, and a light fighter.

I'd say to let him be too. Never know if a new WC game ever did come out, and that might be something invovled in it. (Let alone in the fact that it seems like your trying more for a "side view" of the issue, not to make UE a new version of WC.)

Their economy will probably continue to grow as long as the US, continues to buy their cheap products. I'd almost say that both of our economies are linked in quite a large way. And so what if they have that many people, it doesn't matter if you have 8 billion soldiers if you can blow them...

I tend to agree with Aries, I haven't seen anything that gives this "magical proof" that he doesn't have, that you apparently do.

Ha! It all depends on who's in charge at the time. ;)

Sure, they have that assumption (I'm with ya on that one) but that still doesn't mean that it's true. :)

I'm sure the same could be said about many countries, as long as we're not assuming China holds some, "Hey the US fears us!" concept, then I'm prone to agree with you. (Since there are quite a few people we wouldn't want to fight.) Actually, we have quite an amount of oil we could call...

If it actually makes it out then, I'll be happy to see it. Now if they delay it again...:sigh: I'll be aggrivated. But from what LOAF said of the game, sounds like they may actually make their deadline this time!