Neat Carrier

Discussion in 'Off-topic Zone' started by Marc, Apr 8, 2012.

  1. Marc Commodore

    Message Count:
    533
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    14,635
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    3rd Rock
    Right out of the Avengers movie spot:

    [IMG]

    [IMG]

    A little more excited to see the film 'cause of that.
  2. Sylvester Rear Admiral

    Message Count:
    1,521
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    25,135
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Pensacola
    That is really awesome....I wish the US navy actually had one of those :p
  3. ChrisReid Super Soaker Collector / Administrator

    Message Count:
    11,917
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    69,485
    Location:
    Seattle, Washington, USA
    Huh.. what are the runways for if the VTOL technology is so advanced you can lift a carrier off the sea? :)
    powell99 likes this.
  4. Red Baron Commodore

    Message Count:
    471
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    15,135
    Golf, what did you think?
    Sylvester likes this.
  5. Mace Rear Admiral

    Message Count:
    1,423
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    23,635
    Location:
    Netherlands
  6. Ijuin Admiral

    Message Count:
    1,819
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    36,885
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Tokyo, Japan
    To look at some semi-realistic numbers for a moment, assuming that this carrier would be comparable in mass to a Nimitz or Ford class carrier (about one hundred kilotons), then it would require about 300-odd megawatts just to hover, and about twice that to realistically maneuver and to operate its other systems. In other words, it would require about triple the Nimitz class's 190 MW reactor output. This would be theoretically feasible if the US government cared to spend the twenty or more billion dollars necessary to design and build it. However, it would be just as vulnerable as a surface carrier with regards to enemy missile and artillery fire, while its main advantages would be speed compared to waterborne ships and the ability to operate away from the ocean.
  7. Mojavegreen Spaceman

    Message Count:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    50
    Gender:
    Male
    LMAO, no kidding. After seeing that, I can already hear the R&D gears spooling up and a fund being diverted from the fund that deals with these projects lol. I gustimate the size of that ship to be about 6 times the size of a Nimitz class carrier.
  8. frostytheplebe Seventh Part of the Seal

    Message Count:
    2,118
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    50
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Framingham, Mass
    One might ask the same thing about the Tiger's Claw's runway?
  9. Ijuin Admiral

    Message Count:
    1,819
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    36,885
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Tokyo, Japan
    Taking off in hover mode and coming to a full stop and landing in hover mode both take more time per plane than traditional short-takeoff/landing on a 200-400 meter runway, especially since the plane then has to get out of the way before the next one can be dealt with.

Share This Page