Search results

Either that, or some really nasty depressive one. The best episodes in Star Trek were the survival ones, and if you look, survival films or those with that element are quite popular. Let's have Earth blown up for once, really nice cutscene seeing it getting carved up like a roast ? Haven't...

Cheers. THen again you have other dimensions too And, I'm wondering In other dimensions, if there's a limited number, is there a chance that they would have a different layout of galaxies?

THe old saying "Don't look for what's not there" THing is, I don't like thinking too much about films or tv shows whil I'm watching them as it spoils it. The content should be overwhelming that it's obvious what is supposed to be there. Mind you, some sex scenes in Star Trek/Wing...

Star Trek V was pretty bad. The best Trekker films are 2 and 6 the rest try to be something that they are not.

Hmm, well I quite like the idea of massive corporations running the place. Although this idea has been done to death, mind. Star Trek is not dark. I meant the kind of dark that was overly disturbing. The number of examples I could give is endless.

hmm, we seem to see a lot of energy barriers on Star Trek (lol, it's nice to see they have variance) btw, can't find the handbook available in the UK, anybody know if it is?

Can't wait for it. Hmm, acutally it'd be great to see a pdf handbook near enough like having a handbook (it might just save your life ;)

I sent this to that Tomberwolf guy I think it's about where you have to protect the convoy against a few waves of kilrathi (it mentions "she's old and won't take a battering" something like that. anybody seen it knockign around?

That was the thing in the wc movie. It felt a lot like a WW2 movie. which is great that way. I still love the complement of British actors in there, which makes it feel more like a ship ifyou know what I mean btw, are there any dreadnaughts in WC?

Cheers. i was getting mixed up with the lexington, which btw, i think it would've been nice to see another Panther/Hawk debate. i.e. whether to disable or destroy it (Afterall, you get 2 cutscenes, showing the lexington in a wreck, and just disabled) hmm, are locations jump size...

Lol, that was a little overboard, but you get what I mean. The scores get a little boring too :D

yep. he probably meant, ever corner of this galaxy no doubt. in star trek terms apparently at voyager's top speed (9.975 ?) it'd take 110 years to get to the nearest galaxy which is a bit of a long time really, which again is where the phrase "star trek speeds are too slow" comes in...

Cheers, I've still not seen that film (2001) :)

hmm, Star Trek's idea of war and devastation are a bit childish to be honest. Star Trek 2 was apparently the most violent of the lot. But, an idea:- Perhaps a mix of:- Phantasmagoria (where the husband does really nasty thing to his wives) Less episodes where somebody miraculously...

Um right, well that made sense. maybe not panto then, I can't see widow twanky being that scary.

Even though in Star Trek, they don't venture to other neighbouring galaxies (only those inside the milky way - which when you think about it, why would the Borg invade fluidic space when they could spend a month travelling to a nearby galaxy?) But. perhaps making ships be able to travel fast...

Do you think that Wing Commander could still look darker? (a bit like Aliens maybe). Do you think the film was too "happy" In other words. Would you like Wing Commander do be as dark/gothic/cyber punk like Batman Returns? (not exactly obviously, but you get what I mean). See above post

Kevin Kliner didn't do too bad a job (I think FilmTracks gave it 3 or 4 stars). Please don't use Hans Zimmer :)

No, but the film is really bad :D We went in a group of 10, and 3 stayed to watch it. Although we were all cheering the bad guys on to kill the little SOB :) Nope, I'm not like other people who dis a film just because it's popular. It was in fact a terrible derivative film with little...

OK, but most of those reasons were opinions. Just the facts mam.