Search results

Ask yourself this question: how does the RPG that you are working is better then the ones that already exist or the ones that have existed and already died? What is different from them, and why do people want to check yours out when they could check the others? Main point: you need something...

zako zako?

Nah, just clone George Washington then sick him on the Kilrathi. Two days, tops.

There's a turret crew to man each turret (dual laser turrets and Anti-Matter Guns). There are smaller point defense laser cannons and gatling mass drivers, but those are automated and connected directly to the computer network.

Now.

Fruitcake, this SW/WC crap is just one little part of the stuff that comes from the Wing Commander Aces club, in the name of "expanding the Wing Commander universe" :( As for your question: I'm not really familiar with this era, LOAF can give you a much better detail then I would. I would...

But HEY!!!! Just because a BW supercarrier isn't in the WC Games, doesn't mean that it DOESN"T EXIST!!!!!!!!!!!!! ;) As for the Wing Commander/Star Wars crap, go read some stuff written by NeoDevilbane, a turd in the highest degree.

As the others said . . . the Confederation-class is like a hybrid of a battleship and a heavy carrier. The official designation is dreadnought. (What's very interesting is that in the WC1/2 official strategy guide, it was called a "Confederation-class carrier")

Well, it's really the Exeter from the Super Wing Commander game. Lynx had a field day with the model, he made and textured it. Used it as a pre-WC1 frigate for my site because it was a novel-ship gap that I wanted to fill in. Named it Masada because there was a frigate of it in Action Stations...

A few months ago, I was longing for more Strike Commander background material so I ordered the official strategy guide, hoping it would be as in-depth as the WC1/2 strategy guide in terms of universe, narrative, and fiction. Boy was I fucking dissapointed, it was a flight manual with just a...

Maybe instead of calling them torpedoes in WC1, maybe just call them "anti-ship missiles?" (cause when you think about it, a torpedo is an anti-ship missile)

It's probaly sarcastic. Hell, I thought it was funny.

If he's our lawyer, then we better start writing out our appeal. :mad:

hmmmmmmmmm *scratches his chin a bit* Considering the code was released by the original developers of Freespace 2, it's going to be pretty damn hard to take that off the internet, especially when it was legitimately released. Going back to say "that legitimate release is now illegal, stop...

And they did . . . "The first offensive strike wave was already committed, four hundred strike craft moving out past the outer line of picket ships with four eights of corvettes and light frigates in escort. Long range Confederation patrols were already moving to intercept, a pitiful six...

Regardless of what I think of Derek Smart or the other guys, good or bad (I don't want to get involved in this affair and I'm not taking sides), there's this sort of sick satisfying feeling in seeing two sides who deserve getting a taste of their own medicine do it to each other.

There was a cutscene in SO that had a Vesuvius getting destroyed. The St. Helens was that ship.

You just proved my original point. There's a good justification why the Leyte Gulf could be a Jutland, but then again, there's no bad reason to explain why it shouldn't. It's a grey area, in which it can go either way. That's why for the most part, the best thing to do is assume them as a...

Information says that the Jutland-class carriers were named after sea battles. Battle of Leyte Gulf and the Battle of Trafalgar were sea battles.

Which is why I don't feel comfortable trying to make speculations concerning the start of the war. I'd rather make speculations and work in an area that's "it can go either way" (for example, the ship class of a carrier mentioned in Victory Streak) rather then something that totally contradicts...